Abortion - Interview Turned Essay

One of the greatest conflicts our society faces today is abortion.   Abortion is split into two arguments, “pro-life” versus “pro-choice.”   The terms pro-life and pro-choice generally boil down to the question of whether abortion is right or wrong, but there is much more to the debate than that.   I have chosen to take a look deeper into the great debate on abortion, and truly see the two sides of the argument based on both facts and opinions.
To say that someone is pro-life is to say that the person believes that our government has an obligation to preserve all human life, regardless of intent, viability, or quality-of-life concerns.   The pro-life movement argues that even undeveloped human life is sacred and must be protected by the government.   Abortion, according to pro-life advocates, must not be legal under any circumstances, simply because it is murder, regardless of how premature the unborn child is.   In straightforward terms, they firmly feel that a woman should not have the right to take the life of an innocent being.   They strongly fight for that of an unborn child to be treated equally to that of a living person with rights. Some pro-life advocates argue that it is the presence of life alone, or of unique DNA, that defines personhood.
In contrast, the pro-choice movement argues that human personhood cannot be proven, and they argue that the government should not impede a woman’s right to decide whether or not to continue a pregnancy.   “Pro-choicers” also firmly believe that a fetus is not self aware and could not live on its own without the mother, and therefore is not a living human being or a person.   They also support the fact that our government should support the idea of freedom of choice as an American citizen. In the United States, the pro-choice position is perceived as "pro-abortion." In China, where abortion is sometimes required by law, the pro-choice position would be perceived as "anti-abortion." The purpose of the pro-choice movement...