The purpose of this memo is to provide a recommendation with respect to the Arab-Israeli Conflict. In the first paragraph, the strengths of one proposal will be presented. In the second paragraph, concerns related to the proposal introduced in the first paragraph will be identified. Finally, the third paragraph will contain the recommendation. The first part to reflecting on a proposal is to determine the strengths of the proposals arguments. The strengths of a proposal are key underlying factors that could determine whether a group gets what they want or not and tThe Israeli Government has several strengths in their own proposal. In the latest summit meeting, the Israeli Government summarized their proposal with a thesis saying that: The Jewish population have continually attempted to achieve peace through unselfishness, have suffered throughout history without their holy land, and the land was also rightfully given to Israel. Therefore they deserve Israel, Jerusalem, and the lands before the Jordan River and Mediterranean Sea. Although this proposal may sound like a lot to ask in one Summit tThe Israeli government backs itself proposal up with strong, five, main, arguments that expand relate from to the original thesis statement. The first argument the government made to the proposal was that achieving peace is their main Israeli goal while going through this the process of lending outassigning territory rights and they’ve supported it by giving providing examples such as howwhen they’ve strived to make peace through the years such as signinged peace treaties and participated in peace negotiations despite enduring continued attacks to their people and land. Because This is a strong argument since peace is a topic many of the groups in the Summit have concern over and will want the group that inherits the land to have thatshare their same concernpassion for peace this is a strong argument. Another reason the Israeli government feels that they should maintain the...