Google is not simply a search engine as it has permeated nearly every aspect of our daily
lives. Google, and the Internet as a whole, gives users nearly unlimited access to staggering
amounts of information. The ease of this accessibility has developed into a reliance; when a
question is raised it is usually answered by a Google query rather than an intensive thought
process. In the October 12th
Salon.com
article, “Google Makes Us All Dumber: The
Neuroscience of Search Engines,” Ian Leslie claims Google creates an environment unfavorable
to the creation of good questions which stifles curiosity. He explains that curiosity is what leads
to and inspires a desire to learn. Leslie supports his theory by referencing several neurological
researchers, along with their scientific studies, and succeeds in generating thoughtful reflection
of the Internet’s impact on society. However the article fails in its main objective, which is to
inspire readers to alter the way they use search engines.
Leslie believes the ever increasing ability of Google’s search algorithm to understand
what is being searched before it has been fully entered in the search field leads to users asking
lazier, less thought‐out questions. As Leslie points out, “
the gap between a question
crystallizing in your mind and an answer appearing at the top of your screen is shrinking all the
time.”
Leslie could have developed this point further if he had provided comparison examples
of a sub‐par question with one he considers well formed. Often Google displays the answer
long before the user has finished typing out the question. Leslie contends the elimination of this
gap between the asking of a question and receiving the answer is “atrophying our ability to ask
questions,” which in turn is leading to a decrease in curiosity. He also backs up this claim with a ...